Category Archives: Tyranny

The Islāmic-Clarification of Marital-Rape

Standard

This is something which had been on my Mind/Heart for a Long-Time, regarding precisely how to tackle it. There’s 2 Polarizing Stances holistically as per This-Issue: a. That there’s no such Thing as Marital-Rape…b. That Marital-Rape is anything which any Woman says that it is. Both are Equally-Negative/Toxic Interpretations. This-Conversation will (no Doubt at all) be something Extremely-Risky, because if one is apathetic/careless, they can easily be stigmatized/accused as being a “Sympathizer/Proponent” of Rape-Culture. Even for me personally: for me to dare address this Type/Kind of Issue is quite dangerous for me. It’s something which can yield a Significant-Amount of Backlash, which can backfire in a Terrible-Way absolutely not in my Favor. The Subject of “Marital-Rape” is, by default, very controversial for Obvious-Reasons. It’s something which I (via my Profession as a Chaplain [Counselor/Therapist]) am very familiarized with. Likewise, because of my Position as a Chaplain: this is something that has potential to alienate me astronomically. I’ve literally counseled Countless-Persons regarding This-Issue. And, there’s 0-Doubt concerning how much of a Necessity it is to educate Others (Men especially) the Reality of This-Issue. The 1st-Thing which must be recognized/accepted is that Marital-Rape is a Real-Thing & there’s 0 Islāmic-Justification to deny this. The 2nd-Thing is that “Marital-Rape” must be accurately&honestly defined. The 3rd-Thing is that “Marital-Rape” must be understood via the Context of ash-Sharī`ah/Islāmic-Law, as opposed to Secular-Law. The 4th-Thing is that “Marital-Rape” must be compared/contrasted to Sexual-Abuse & must be examined as per if/how it’s Islāmically-Punishable. I plan to purposely ruffle the Feathers of Lots of People, because Convos like this must be had & being soft about it just can’t/won’t get it done.

Defining “Marital-Rape”

Any&all Sexual-Contact/Acts imposed upon Spouses without Sexual-Consent.

Defining al-Ightisāb/Sexual-Abuse:

Any&all Sexual-Contact which is imposed upon Others without Sexual-Consent (Necrophilia, Bestiality, Child-Molestation, Rape, Sex-Trafficking/Prostitution, etc.).

(Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr; Merriam-Webster)

Contextualizing “Marital-Rape”

Marital-Rape, mostly claimed by Women, is predicated upon the Pontification of Sexual-Agency/Autonomy. Meaning, the Concept of “Women’s-Liberation”/Feminism, fuels this. With that being said, anything which is classically understood via at-Tanzīl/Revelation, Historical-Norms via Human-Societies/Civilizations, etc. is falsely classified as Misogyny. In the case of “Marital-Rape”, this is abundantly obvious. Islāmically, in spite of the Fact that Marital-Rape is a Real-Thing, it most definitely isn’t predicated upon Feminists-Views. And, this is exclusively because of the Nature of an-Nikāh/Marriage itself. As per ash-Sharī`ah: an-Nikāh is a Religio-Sexual Commitment between Man&Woman, predicated upon at-Tanzīl. In fact, ironically: the Etymology of the Word “Nikāh” is literally al-Jinsiyyah (Sexuality/Sexual-Intercourse). By definition, Sexual-Intercourse is the Most-Rudiment/Foundational Dimension of any Marriage, so much so that if one is Sexually-Dissatisfied then that alone is Valid-Grounds for Marital-Annulment: this literally applies to both Men & Women. Allah details clearly, via The Qur’ān, that Sexual-Gratification is a Marital-Right/Expectation for both Man & Woman equally, and neither Woman nor Man is Islāmically justified to deny one another Sexual-Appeasement, as Muhammad (Peace be upon them) mentioned: “Approach them whenever/however you will, feed them what you feed yourselves, clothe them however you clothe yourselves, don’t disrespect them, don’t strike/beat them.”.
(Chpt.2, V.228; Chpt.4, V.19; Muslim; Abū-Dāwud; Lisān-ul-`Arab)

Proving Marital-Rape

What constitutes Marital-Rape according to ash-Sharī`ah can only be based on 3-Things: a. If one is forced to have Sex after being abused…b. If one is forced to have Sex while experiencing Illness…c. If one is forced to comply with participating in Islāmically-Prohibited Acts.

a. Abuse:

To abuse someone (physically, psycho-emotionally, etc.) & then to press them for Sex realistically counts as Marital-Rape, based on the Statement of Muhammad (Peace be upon them): “How dare any of you beat their Wives, as if they’re a Slave or a Beast, then expect them to be warm towards you sexually?!!!”.
(al-Bukhārī&Muslim)

b. Illness:

It’s Mahrūm/Islāmically-Prohibited to force one’s Spouse to engage in Sex while they’re Ill is in fact Marital-Rape. For the Record: a Woman experiencing their Menstrual-Cycle counts as al-Mardh (Illness/Sickness), as Allah states: “And don’t approach them, until after they purify/clear themselves (after their Menstrual-Cycle ceases).”.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.222; at-Tabarī; as-Suyūtī)

c. Sexual-Prohibition:

To force one’s Spouse to commit and/or comply with Things like: al-Liwāt/Sodomy (Anal-Sex), Orgies, Prostitution, etc. is a Valid-Case for Marital-Rape.
(al-Kabā’ir/The Major-Sins, adh-Dhahabī)

Marital-Rape Exaggerations

Now, how’s it even possible for anyone to actually prove that Marital-Rape, even as per the Aforementioned-Conditions, actually took place?!!! That’s the challenge, to be able to prove it. This is where it gets very complex/complicated. And, one Particular-Example of this is a Husband enjoying their Wife while they’re asleep. Ironically enough, there’s actually those whom would actually consider something like this to constitute as “Marital-Rape”…Islāmically something like this most definitely doesn’t fall under Marital-Rape inherently by the way. I’ve literally counseled Men whose Wives have literally accused them of “Marital-Rape”, resulting from them wanting Sex while the Woman is asleep. This is honestly quite ridiculous though. I mean, that’s literally like any Husband crying “Marital-Rape”, resultung from their Wife giving them Blowjobs while they’re asleep…like seriously, really?!!! Also, even if/when any Woman can prove Marital-Rape: exactly what Kind/Type of Hadd/Islāmic-Punishment does one actually expect that their Spouse receive?!!! Because, afterall, the Hadd for al-Ightisāb is Death-Penalty.
(Abū-Dawud)

Retribution for Marital-Rape

Realistically, external of any Secular-Law: there’s actually 0 Revelatory/Textual Hadd for Marital-Rape, in spite of it definitely being Islāmically-Wrong. And, in All-Truthfulness, there’s plenty of Other-Sins which don’t have any Mundane-Hudūd/Islāmic-Punishments attached to them (like purposely not fasting via the Month of Ramadhān, purposely not making al-Hajj/Pilgrimage, an-Namīmah/Backbiting, etc.). However, via the Ākhirah/Hereafter, Allah will choose whether or not Allah will forgive/pardon vs. shun/punish those whom commit this. Because, surely, no one will escape the Qist/Justice of Allah. Anything/everything which is done Allah knows it, records it, will press those whom do it, as They mention regarding al-Mujrimūn/the Criminals: “What Kind/Type of Book is this (their own Record of Deeds) which leaves nothin small nor large, expect that it’s been enumerated/recorded?!!!”.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.10, V.44, Chpt.18, V.49)

Clearly, there’s going to be People who’ll despise what I’ve presented via This-Article & of course: Controversy isn’t something which I’m foreign to, nor am I shy from. However, I must be Muslim-1st. And, via being Muslim-1st, I’ll most definitely piss People off & I’m OK with that. Besides, I’m Smart/Wise enough to know what I always tell People: Controversy is the Best-Publicity.

Gareth Bryant 1443, A.H./2022, A.H.

Dissecting the “Toxic-Masculinity & Toxic-Patriarchy” Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative

Standard

1. The Human-Race is called “Children-Of-Adam” 8-Times, Word4Word, via at-Tanzīl/Revelation. This by definition indicates that Adam is the Patriarch of the Human-Race.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.27; Chpt.7, V.26-27, 31&35, 172; Chpt.17, V.70; Chpt.36, V.60)

2. Adam (Peace be upon them), the 1st-Human, was a Man.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.30-37; at-Tabarī, as-Suyūtī, ibn-Kathīr)

3. The Word “Female” literally derives from the Word “Male” & the Word “Woman literally derives from the Word “Man”. And that’s because Hawwā’/Eve (Peace be upon them) was created from an Extracted-Portion of the Anatomy of Adam. In fact, the Word “Hawwā'” literally means “To be completely-created from something already alive/breathing.”.
(Merriam-Webster; Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr)

4. Historically, via Normal-Circumstances (external of Rape, Non-Marital Pregnancies, Adoption of Children abandoned without knowledge of their Heritage, etc.): People have always been granted the Names of their Fathers.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.33, V.5; at-Tabarī; as-Suyūtī)

5. (Historically) Most Surnames/Last-Names, regardless of: Language, Culture, Society, etc. have always been Masculine-Names.

6. There’s literally Women (in spite of the Fact that this is Mahrūm/Islāmically-Prohibited) whom take-on the Names of their Husbands via Marriage.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.33, V.5)

Gareth Bryant 1443, A.H./2022, C.E.

Starving for Attention via Preying upon the Ignorant

Standard

Allah states: “Have you seen those whom take their Desires as their God? Are you then their Enabler?
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.25, V.43)

Let’s talk about Mufti Abū-Layth

Nahiem Ajmal is their Real-Name, by the way. They’ve made quite the Name/Reputation for themselves, for a Long-Time, via their Self-Proclaimed Religio-Scholarship (and/or lack-thereof). However, they’ve particularly embarked upon something very dangerous. This Particular-Thing is literally attacking one of the most Respected Religio-Scholars amongst Muslums since the Revelation of The Qur’ān: Muhammad ibn-Ismā`īl al-Bukhārī. The most Wellknown-Canon of Religio-Academic Work of al-Bukhārī actually bears their Moniker: Sahīh-ul-Bukhārī/the Authentic-Collection of al-Bukhārī. This-Work is known even by Non-Muslims, as a Premier-Source for Revelatory/Textual-Info. regarding al-Islām (relative to the Revelation of The Qur’ān). But, sadly, there’re Persons like Abī-Layth whom deem to totally discredit al-Bukhārī…why I honestly don’t even know. What I do know is that, simply as an Islāmic-Academic: al-Bukhārī was (still is Centuries after their Death) Light-Years ahead of the Likes of Abī-Layth, especially via their Mukhtasir/Specialty of Religio-Scholarship known as `Ulūm-il-Hadīth/Hadīth-Science (the Islāmic-Discipline dedicated to the Preservation/Documentation of The Qur’ān & the Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition jointly). The Irony is that even the Religio-Opposition to al-Bukhārī, via their Lifetime, praised their Religio-Scholastic Diligence.

http://www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/quranandsunnahjointly

Let’s talk about al-Imma`tiyyah (Groupie/Stan-Culture) via “Muslim-Celebrity/Scholar” Culture

Abū-Layth isn’t the Only-Muslim to criticize someone like al-Bukhārī, or any other `Ālim (Muslim Religio-Academic/Scholar). And, really, This-Issue is much deeper than Abū-Layth criticizing al-Bukhārī. What it’s truly about is someone like Abū-Layth, whom knows that there’s a Following which they have, whom outlandishly posture Things regarding Religio-Dynamics/Issues which are quite honestly their Audience doesn’t possess the Objectivity to handle. And, this comes at the Expense of Ignorant/Impressionable-Persons literally rejecting Islāmic-Knowledge (via Revelatory-Texts), without any Justification, simply because their “Favorite-Scholar/Speaker” said so. Their Audience are Dick-Riders, whom’ll literally co-sign anything/everything which they state, via Personality-Worship (Another-Sifah/Manifestation of al-Imma`tiyyah by the way). People whom’re Religio-Groupies of Persons like Abī-Layth are the Reason how/why Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated: “Don’t be an Imma`ah/Dick-Rider.”.
(at-Tirmidhī)

Ironically, it’s literally no different than how Rap-Beefs catapult into Street-Violence, for no other Reason than a Person dick-riding what they’ve heard from a Rap-Song, a Rapper-Interview, etc. Just as Allah states: “And never let your hatred, against any People, prevent you from behaving justly.”. Also, Muhammad (Peace be upon them stated: Apathy/Arrogance is denying Truth & mocking People.”. As well, Mu`ādh ibn-Jabal (May Allah be pleased with them) stated: “Always accept Truth, even if it comes from a Kāfir (Disbeliever/Non-Muslim) or a Fāsiq/Sinful-Person. And, this sets the Precedent for the Islāmic-Principle: “Truth is Truth, regardless of whom/where it comes from.”.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.8; an-Nawawī; Abū-Dāwud)

Let’s talk about the “Bukhārīgate” Video-Series produced via Abī-Layth

https://youtu.be/X6SfFYRljeY

https://youtu.be/IijbMTxUEOw 

I watched both Part-1 & Part-2. I’ve personally commented on both Part-1&2 Videos. I’ve even personally messaged Abā-Layth almost everything mentioned here, almost Word4Word prior to actually authoring this Article. I’m not going to give Commentary upon the Entirety of both Videos. But, what I will do is simply detail some Specific-Things which Abā-Layth literally proves the Depths of their own: Ignorance, Apathy/Arrogance, etc.

Beginning from 5:30 on the Part-2 of this “Bukhārīgate” Video-Series: There’ a Story which Abū-Layth criticizes a Scenario, in which Muhammad (Peace be upon them) witnessed an Unnamed-Companion (May Allah be pleased with them) praying & reciting from The Qur’ān which was removed from the Mushaf/Corpus of The Qur’ān via an-Naskh (Abrogation/Cancelation). This was clearly referring to a Companion whom was reciting something from The Qur’ān which was Mansūkh (Religio-Abrogated/Canceled) as well as striken from the Dhikr/Memory of Muhammad, Mushaf of The Qur’ān, etc.

Equally, it was clear that This-Person was reciting (from Such&Such-Sūrah/Chapter from The Qur’ān) something from The Qur’ān which they learned prior to Those-Āyāt/Verses being Mansūkh. Also, as per the Athar/Non-Prophetic Narration of `Umar ibn-il-Khattāb (May Allah be pleased with them): it was clear that the Āyah/Verse of al-Jamrah/Stonning was as well amongst the Āyāt which were Mansūkh.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.87, V.6&7; at-Tabarī; as-Suyūtī; al-Bukhārī)

As per 15:55 on the Par-2 of this “Bukhārīgate” Video-Series: It was a Known-Fact, that Muhammad (Peace be upon them) were Illiterate & never learned how to read/write. Also, when any Human is dying, then Yes…they do in fact experience Certain-Severities of Dellirium: Muhammad (Peace be upon them) was never spared from this. Also, on their Deathbed, they literally mentioned to their Daughter Fātimah (May Allah be pleased with them), 1-Day prior to their Death: “After This-Day I’ll no longer suffer.”, pertaining to the Agony/Suffering-Of-Death. as-Sakrah/Dellirium is a Sifah/Manifestation of Agony/Suffering, especially via al-Mawt/Death. This particularly pertains to the Dying-Days of Muhammad: they requested Pen&Paper to author/write something, in spite of the Fact that it was Mutawātir/Common-Knowledge that they never learned al-Kitābah/Literacy.

http://www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2019/11/13/quranism

And, moreover: their Claims that Animals never verbally communicated with Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals (Peace be upon them altogether) & them disputing the Sexual-Prowess of Sulaymān/Solomon: they had Fawā’id/Capabilities which no other Kawn/Makhlūq (Being/Created-Thing) had. They possessed Overwhelming-Capabilities to communicate with Terrestrial-Beings like Animals, Jinns/Fire-Beings, Angels, even Allah Themselves, etc. And, Allah gave Primal/Physical-Strength to Anbiyā’ which’re totally unmatched in comparison to Other-Beings. Furthermore, there’s a Difference between a Fitnah/Test & an `Adhāb/Punishment. Anbiyā’ were in fact tested via Deaths/Injuries upon themselves, their Loved-Ones, etc. (Ayyūb/Job [Peace be upon them] as an Ideal-Example). As for Animals being miraculously allowed by Allah to speak…Allah has allowed Infants to speak, and both Animals & Infants speaking are documented as Mu`jizāt/Prophetic-Miracles even prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.7, V.157&158; Chpt.50, V.19; al-Bukhārī; at-Tabarī, as-Suyūtī, ibn-Kathīr)

Also, via the Part-2 Video-Series: Abū-Layth is an Outright-Kādhib/Liar…Allah literally uses the Wording “Radhiyallahu/Allah is pleased”…Multiple-Times via The Qur’ān. So, them criticizing a Hadīth (Recorded/Documented-Narration) of Muhammad stating that Allah was pleased with both `Abdillah ibn-`Uthmān ibn-`Āmir & `Umar ibn-il-Khattāb (May Allah be pleased with them both), claiming that the Wording of the Narration has 0 Islāmic-Validity is a Kadhib/Lie.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.119; Chpt.9, V.100; Chpt.58, V.22: Chpt.98, V.8)

I’ll leave it up to you, the Reader, to make your own Determinations about Abī-Layth…I’ve made my own.

Gareth Bryant 1443, A.H./2022, C.E.

Islāmophobia via Feminism

Standard

I recently read an Article via Muslim Matters, regarding a very Controversial-Issue, predicated upon Islāmophobic-Tahrīf/Distortion (done by Muslims & Non-Muslims alike ironically) of the Revelatory-Text above. This Revelatory-Text is one of Countless Revelatory-Texts, which detail whom and/or which Kinds/Types of Beings will dwell either within al-Jannah/Paradise or Jahannam/Hell. The Link to the Muslim Matters Article is below:

http://www.muslimmatters.org/2022/03/02/more-women-in-hell-or-heaven/

I’m honestly unsurprised that this is still a Controversial-Topic. But, I’m disturbingly surprised at just how Pathologically-Ignorant Muslims are concerning This-Issue. It’s almost like Certain-Muslims will literally use their Misunderstandings of a seemingly Gendercentric/Genderbiased-Subject to pontificate an Islāmophobic-Agenda, like the whole “Islāmic-Reformation” Agenda which has the Audacity to pontificate/promote that Certain Revelatory-Texts are “outdate” for the “Modern-World”. This is what happens,when People approach Issues via Egotism, as oppose to Objective-Knowledge. Taking just 1 Revelatory-Text to explain anything doesn’t always work, especially as per a Subject which can easily be weaponized by Islāmophobes whom already accuse al-Islām of being Pro-Misogyny.

Muhammad ibn Seereen reported that a group of people either boasted or discussed whether men will outnumber women in Paradise or the other way around. It was upon this that Abu Hurayrah said, “Did Abu Al-Qaasim (the Prophet, sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) not say that the first group to enter Paradise would have their faces as bright as a full moon and the next group would have their faces as bright as the brightest star in the sky, that each of them would have two wives and the marrow of their shanks would glimmer beneath the flesh and there would be no bachelors in Paradise.” [Muslim]

This Revelatory-Text clarifies completely the Issue. It clearly indicates directly/overtly that Women will outnumber Men via the Paradise by at least twofold. However, instead of simply accepting that understanding many Revelatory-Texts is literally impossible via only looking through 1-Dimension/Lens: People don’t know Shit really think/feel that they know everything. And, honestly, this is something which we all struggle within internally/introspectively.

In spite of the Fact that the Muslim Matters Article was, I believe, well-intentioned & well-written: I’m still concerned&worried that there’s going to be Muslim&Non-Muslim-Islāmophobes who’ll continue to be Ego/Desire-Driven, and will continue to distort Revelatory-Texts such as the Subject at Hand, which they’ll still use as Fuel for their Islāmophobic-Fires.

Gareth Bryant 1443, A.H./2022, C.E.

al-`Asabiyyah/Xenophobia: Ukraine-Edition

Standard

Political-Hypocrisy: Ukraine-Edition

Standard

And never let your hatred, against any People, prevent you from behaving justly.(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.8)

Russia, headed by Vladimir Putin, invaded/occupied Ukraine in Feb. of 2022. The World watched-on, as Putin postured very similarly to the likes of: Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, etc. sweeping across the Crimea. It’s literally like reliving 1939 all over again, as the 3rd-Reich mowed over Poland via World-War II. Russia has been condemned for this naturally. However, it’s in fact ironic who’s leading the Charge to condemn Russia in the 1st-Place: the US & Israel. Both these Nation-States have literally done the Same-Things via their Histories. The US annexing the Entirety of what’s now the United States via the “Indian-Wars”…Israel annexing of the Sinai-Peninsula, the West-Bank, the Golan-Heights, etc. via the “Arab-Israeli Wars” from the 1950’s-1970’s…the US invading/occupying: Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Somalia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Also, assisting their Allies to drone/bomb Syria & Yemen to Death. This is supposed to be “tolerable/acceptable”, while they’ve the Audacity to judge the Actions of Russia?!!!

#MakeItMakeSense

You either judge everyone or no one…you either give everyone or no one a Pass.

Gareth Bryant 1443, A.H./2022, C.E.

Unrealistic-Expectations via Religio-Positions amongst Muslims

Standard

This is particularly important to make issue of, because it occurs far too often. Amongst Muslims the Term “Imām” represents one of the most Coveted-Titles which can be bestowed upon any Muslim-Male. The Actual-Meaning of the Term is “One whom heads/leads Others.”.
(Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr)

It’s often conventionally understood/misunderstood, interpreted/misinterpreted, presumed/assumed, etc. that whomever dons this Title and/or is granted the Title is an “`Ālim” (Person-Of-Knowledge, Academic, Scholar, Religio-Authority, etc.). By default, Imāms are automatically placed in the Same-Category as those whom pontificate/claim the Titles: Shaykh/Teacher, Ustādh (Professor/Lecturer), etc. or granted Those-Titles by their Communities, Peers, Teachers, etc. So, if/when any Muslim-Male is viewed as being in the Position of being an “Imām” are immediately catapulted into an Arena which can often yield: Egotism, Arrogance, Despotism, Thirst/Lust for Influence, Power, Authority, etc. So much so, that even Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated: “Whomever is made a Judge/Ruler between People, has been slaughtered without even a Weapon.”.
(Abū-Dāwud)

As for me, personally, as a Muslim-Male Chaplain: I’m literally challenged by this on a Daily. I’m constantly/consistently faced with Fellow-Muslims attempting to trap me into a Boxed-In/Pigeon-Holed Space, because of my Chaplaincy-Profession. Something important to note is that (historically & contemporaneously) the Vast-Majority of Muslim-Male Chaplains have never been (nor will ever be) “Imāms”, as conventionally understood/misunderstood by Other-Muslims. So, because of the Linguistic/Implied-Meaning of the Term “Imām”: Muslim-Male Chaplains are thereby unjustly expected to live their Lives as “Community-Leaders”, yet ironically the Role of a Muslim-Chaplain has nothing to do with al-Imāmah/Leadership & everything to do with al-Khidmah/Service. A Chaplain is a Servant of the People: empowering them with Tools to correct their own Narratives of the Human-Condition…we are not anyone’s “Leaders”.

Gareth Bryant

Sex-Ed is necessary for Muslims…get with the Program People

Standard

The Evil of Sexploitation

Standard

Allah states:

“Have you seen those whom take their Desires as their God? Are you then their Enabler?”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.25, V.43)

Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated:

“Amongst the Initial-Revelation given to Prophetic-Individuals was the following: ‘Anyone who’s shameless does whatever they want.’.”

(an-Nawawī)

Sexual-Exploitation is a Time-In-Memorial Vice via the Human-Experience. Literally, for Millennia: Human-Societies have always either resisted or embraced, repelled or accepted, combated or tolerated, etc. az-Zinā/THOTery via Various-Sifāt/Manifestations. Nation-States have placed Bans/Regulations via Religio/Secular-Laws, Countries have legalized Certain Sexual-Vices, Countless-Persons have monetarily profitted handsomely (via the Pontification, Promotion, Proliferation, etc.) from using az-Zinā as a Modality of al-Matā`/Entertainment.

The Islāmic-Posture towards Sex-Crimes & the Damage they cause

Sexual-Abuse Awareness&Activism

The Irony is that there’s really a Sadistic-Agenda pushing to pontificate, promote, and even glorify “Sex-Work”. Yet, the Diabolical-Nature of the Sex-Industry is nothing short of obvious. Especially referring to the Porn-Industry: Pornography literally promotes Necrophilia, Bestiality, Child-Molestation, Rape, etc. And, in spite of this it’s still Secularly-Legal all across the Planet…how/why?!!!

Fake-Wokeness via the “Ethical-Porn” Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative

Sexploitation is the Human-Cause of Lots of Elements via Societies which’re barbaric, as well as equally diseased (figuratively & literally). Certain-Societies which literally use Sexploitation to influence/control Demographics, Politics, Morality, etc.

Sexual-Grooming Realities

We, as Human-Beings, must do better to free ourselved from Sexual-Addiction. Sexual-Addiction literally places Certain-People in Robot-Mode. It’s really as though all they think/feel about is Sexual-Material/Content. It’s like Sex is literally they discuss, share via Online/Social-Media, speak publicly about, etc. I, personally, know Scores of Countless-People: literally These-People go Above&Beyond to share the Most-Outlandish Sexual-Content via Online, Social-Media, etc.

Gareth Bryant

The Reality of Anti-Blackness which Muslims pretend doesn’t exist

Standard

Persons like them are literally no different from/than Said Rageah:

A Hujjah/Indictment against Said Rageah: a Muslim-Hatemonger

Rudolph Ware

Every Muslim of Afro-Descent or “Afro-Looking”, “Black-Looking”, etc. has at least 1-Story just like this, when they were victimized and/or directly confronted/addressed al-`Asabiyyah/Xenophobia via Anti-Blackness. Regardless of whom is willing to admit this or not: it’s a Harsh-Reality.

There’s actually Several-Resources which validly depict how/why Anti-Blackness amongst Muslims is a Serious-Problem:

a. The Muslim-Caste System which Muslims have established as an Unwritten-Rule for the Past-Millennium
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2020/03/16/muslimcastesystem)

b. The Bilāl-Mythos
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/bilalmoviereinforcesslavenarrative)

c. al-`Asabiyyah (Xenophobia via White-Supremacy/Anti-Black ness) via Muslim Religio-Scholarship
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2020/09/08/antiblacknessandtextualdistortion)

d. Religio-Rejection of “Black-Lives Matter”
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2020/06/10/islamophobiaviaxenophobia)

e. Anti-Blackness amongst Muslim Afro-Peoples
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2019/11/14/muslim-hatemonger)

f. Muslim-Coonery
(www.garethbryant.wordpress.com/2021/11/29/mymuslimlifetime)