This details a Real-Mindset, which unfortunately Countless-Men truly have. I honestly know Countless-Men whom possess this Type/Kind of Mentality towards/against Women.
Allah states:
“And empower one another via Positivity&Morality. But, don’t embolden one another via Sin&Enmity.”…”Have you seen those whom take their Desires as their God? Are you then their Enabler”.
Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated:
“Always speak Truth, even if it’s bitter (even if it rubs People the Wrong-Way).”
Someone whom I know, whom I frequently engage with regarding Religio-Subjects/Topics decided to foward me a Quoted-Statement of one of the Top-3 Students of Ahmad ibn-Taymiyyah. The Statement is attributed to ibn-il-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. Here’s the Following-Statement:
This-Statement is exclusively pertaining to a Particular-Ithm/Sin, in fact a Kibār/Major-Sin known as Adultery. For More-Info. regarding Major-Sins, you can research al-Kabā’ir/The Major-Sins authored by adh-Dhahabī (ironically also amongst the Top-3 Students of ibn-Taymiyyah).
The Person whom sent me this & myself actually went Back&Forth, at length, regarding This-Statement…”Let’s get into it.” as they say.
I began the Convo with This-Person via the Following-Reply:
This-Statement is very dangerous, if misunderstood/misinterpreted. Principally: Men & Women aren’t viewed differently via ash-Sharī`ah, when it comes to Most-Sins…az-Zinā/THOTery is of course an Example of that. (Also) if a Woman being an Adultress were worse than a Man being an Adulterer, then how/why does the Hadd/Islāmic-Punishment of Adultery equally apply to both Men & Women?!!! Only Muslim-Men whom want Zinā/THOTery-Passes will cling to Āthār/Statements such as these, which ironically are simply Madhāhib/Religio-Opinions & not Nuzūl/Revelatory-Texts.
The Other-Person was very Short-Worded via their Exchanges with me.
Sadly, it was Crystal-Clear, the Person I conversed with was set in their Ways regarding the Mindset towards the Subject-Matter. Keep in Mind: this is the Same-Mothafucka whom audaciously/arrogantly pontificated&claimed that if Married-Men get Blowjobs from Women they’re not married to then it’s not Adultery. Yes…this is the Goofy-Shit I must deal with, confront, etc. on a Daily-Basis.
And, it then became pointless to discuss Things any further. My Entire-Point was & still is that if/whenever Persons take Statements of Religio-Academic/Historical Individuals, there’s got to be Comprehension at play regarding what’s cited/quoted from them. As Latter-Peoples, we don’t have the Islāmic-Justification to just run with the Statements of Former-Peoples just to pontificate/promote Biases which we may harbor via our Minds/Hearts. And, as per the Convo I shared: it’s very obvious to me-The Person I conversed with had a Bias-Based Agenda.
What I mean by Bias-Based Agenda:
I actually know Countless Muslim-Men whom literally make it their Business to cheat on their Wives via Impunity. They really think/feel that they’re Entitled to be Adulterers, yet in the Same-Breath dare to judge any Woman for being an Adultress. THOTery isn’t Gendercentric…any Man or any Woman can be a THOT. So, let’s not ever perceive that the Rules-Of-Morality only apply to Women. No, they equally apply to both Men & Women alike. I’ve constantly/consistently confronted Countless-Scenarios of Muslim-Men I personally know: they’ll attempt to excuse Other Muslim-Men for being Adulterous. Yet, ironically, they’ll jump out the Window to condemn any Muslim-Woman who’s done precisely what the Muslim-Men they try to defend has done. It’s both hypocritical & disgusting…I truly despise it. I operate via a Personal-Principle: You either judge everyone or no one…you either give everyone or no one a Pass.
One of the Key-Things which Islāmophobes use against Muslims, to paint False-Imagery, is pontificating/claiming that al-Islām is Pro-Misogyny. And, the Subject of This-Article is most definitely amongst the Numerous-Tools which Islāmophobes use. But, there’s most definitely a Practical-Way to combat this. There needs to be More Muslim-Men whom possess the Basālah/Courage to address Issues such as this. We, as Muslim-Men, must never give each other “Passes” to be Immoral/Amoral & then audaciously/arrogantly chastise Muslim-Women whom aren’t Morally-Correct. at-Taqwā/Morality is a Farīdhah/Islāmic-Requirement (upon every Muslim) regardless of al-Jins/Gender. at-Taqwā has never been Gendercentric, not even prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān & it never will be Gendercentric.
We, as Muslim-Men, must/need to stop buying into & promoting the “Boys will be Boys.” Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative. We must/need to cultivate Muslim-Men positively, as per possessing Personal-Responsibility & manifesting Personal-Accountability, referring to them living their Best-Lies. We must/need to enforce the Reality that being a Womanizer isn’t a “Flex”.
This Particular-Video (via Facebook) by the ACLU, it highlighted the “Abortion-Issue”…I’ve written extensively, regarding this. This-Issue, for Obvious-Reasons is very polarizing, divisive, etc. However, that’s really not what caught my Attention as per this Video…I’ll further explain later.
What truly caught me, watching the ACLU-Video, was when the Person via the Video pontificating/claiming that Patriarchy is one of the “Oppressive-Systems” which must be abolished. So, of course, me being me…I challenged the Fake-Woke Idiocy of That-Statement, with the following:
Explain how Patriarchy is an “Oppressive-System”… …#IllWait
Naturally, I became Earmarked for a Barrage of Fake-Woke Commentators…I’ll share the Exchanges between myself & someone named Michell Wood:
Michell Wood: Gareth Bryant a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. Now, in the same vein, explain how Jim Crow and Red-Lining are helpful to POC. …#I’llWait
Gareth Bryant: Michell Wood
a. That’s actually not the Definition of Patriarchy.
b. Fake-Wokers, such as yourself, always attempt to conflate Patriarchy & Misogyny as though they’re the same, when ironically they’re the Polar-Opposites of each other.
c. Jim-Crow & Redlining have 0 to do with Gendercentric-Issues & everything to do with al-`Asabiyyah/Xenophobia via Ethnocentrism, Colorism, White-Supremacy, etc.
d. Your Usage of “POC” proves that Persons like you are literally Part of the Problem: All-Humans are Melanated-Persons, because, All-Humans produce Melanin. Melanin, of course, being a Bio-Genetic Byproduct of Pigmentation: the Human-Version of Chlorophyll. All-Humans produce Pigment…we’re all Pigmented-Beings. Every Human-Cell is pigmented by default… …#BasicBiology
Speaking of Basic-Biology, there’s only 2-Genders: Male & Female predicated upon Male-Sperm (XY/XX-Chromosomes). And, ironically, the Fact that Male-Gametes (Sperm) biologically determines Biological-Genders…that’s literally Patriarchy by default.
Moreover, just for the Hell of it:
a. “Female” literally comes from the Word “Male”…Patriarchy by default.
b. “Woman” literally comes from the Word “Man”…Patriarchy by default.
c. “She” literally comes from the Word “He”…Patriarchy by default.
a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society controlled by men in which they use their power to their own advantage:
You can have your own (jackass) opinion, but not your own definitions and facts.
Still waiting for your erudite treatise on how Jim Crow and Red-Lining are beneficial to POC…
Michelle Wood: Gareth Bryant you can be incredibly wrong all day long? Yup. No doubt. Yes, all people are pigmented…except for those individuals with acute albinism. …#BasicBiology.
Gender is a social construct. Sex is a biological designator. So bzzzzz! Incredibly wrong yet again.
Bzzzzz! The words male and female are not linked etymologicallly. Another …#GarethBryantFailsAgain.
Woman etymology: Look up the actual origins dumbass… #I’mboredwithyou
Origin of “she” is disputed. Again, more than a quick Wikipedia check will be helpful to you.
…#IcanAlsoDoThisAllDay
…#GarethBryantPseudointellectualism
Gareth Bryant: Michell Wood Persons whom suffer from Albinism are still Melanated-Persons: Eye-Color, Skin-Color, Hair-Color, etc. are Pigmented & Albinos still produce Pigmentation which determines their Eye-Color, Skin-Color, Hair-Color. Albinos aren’t “Transparent”, or “Translucent”. So, Yeah: you still haven’t proven anything, other than how pathologically-ignorant you are concerning Basic-Biology.
Gareth Bryant: Michell Wood
Cambridge University Dictionary literally changed/altered their Definition/Interpretation of what a Man & Woman is. So, by default, as per This-Discussion: Cambridge University Dictionary isn’t trustworthy.
Etymology/Word-Origin: Middle-English from Old-English Wifman (Wif/Woman + Man). First Known-Usage Pre 12th-Century, C.E. (Merriam-Webster)
Michelle Wood: Gareth Bryant dude. Look it up. Albinism is a lack of pigmentation – with varying levels of acuity. Do some freaking research, you absolute muppet. Good thing you studied polysci and history 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣.
Gareth Bryant yes, I can Google, too…keep reading. It will get easier.
Gareth Bryant 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣. Sure. You get to decide that. Language evolves, dude. You are not qualified to determine that Cambridge magically no longer counts…wow. Thanks for the laugh.
Gareth Bryant: Michell Wood
Gender
a subclass within a grammatical class (such as noun, pronoun, adjective, or verb) of a language that is partly arbitrary but also partly based on distinguishable characteristics (such as shape, social rank, manner of existence, or sex) and that determines agreement with and selection of other words or grammatical forms the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex
Sex
either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of their reproductive organs and structures
the sum of the structural, functional, and sometimes behavioral characteristics of organisms that distinguish males and females
the state of being male or female
(Merriam-Webster)
Michell Wood: Gareth Bryant yes, I know the difference between gender and sex. Reading comprehension is a bit of a challenge for you, isn’t it? It is a wonder that you managed to graduate. Didn’t your college teach critical thinking? Look up Bloom’s Taxonomy for a good starting place. You can improve your skills through remedial study. Have you talked to your doctor about the possibility of removing your head from your rectal cavity?
Needless to say…they literally didn’t care how incorrect they were, concerning not knowing Basic-Definitions of Concepts, Words, etc. which they think/feel they’ve Expertise about.
Then, someone else decided to get-in on the Action…Sandy Cook. I managed to get Some-Intel concerning them: they’re a Typical-Feminazi (Special-Force Version of Feminist).
After combing through their Writings, it’s abundantly-clear: they don’t actually want “Gender-Equality”. Rather, they & those like them are literally no different/better than any Misogynist. They’re Misandrists, whom (much like any Misogynist) wish to further perpetuate Gender-Wars between Men & Women.
So, apparently, This-Person known as Andrew Bauman is a Self-Admitted Social-Eunuch. So, of course I responded with the following:
Gareth Bryant: Sandy Cook
1. Gender-Determination via Male-Gametes (Sperm)… …XY/XX: Patriarchy by default.
2. The Concept of Geneology: Patriarchy by default.
3. The Concept of Surnames/Last-Names: Patriarchy by default.
4. The Word “Woman” literally comes from the Word “Man”: Patriarchy by default.
5. The Word “Female” literally comes from the Word “Male”: Patriarchy by default.
6. Bruce Jenner was named “Woman Of The Year” via Time Magazine: that’s actually not even Patriarchy, but rather it’s Misogyny by default.
So, what’s actually your Point?!!!
#IllWait
Both Michelle Wood & Sandy Cook blocked me. 0-Surprise…as I always tell People: If they blocked you firstly, then you won the Argument. The Fact that they knew they couldn’t rebuttle anything I articulated: it’s truly revealing, as per what they pontificate/claim, which proves they represent nothing truthful or even honest for That-Matter. This is really the M.O. of Feminism&Feminists.
Gareth Bryant 