Gareth Bryant’s Hujjah/Refutation against the “Imāms-Roundtable”

Standard

What’s the “Imāms-Roundtable” anyway?!!!

In Theory, it’s allegedly supposed to be an Entity/Forum to discuss & strategize how to address Religio-Issues plaguing Muslim-America. In Reality, what it actually is though is an Ash`arīs vs. Everybody Else Situation. It’s 💯% predicated upon Hizbī/Religio-Sectarian Bias vs. Favoritism.

My Assessment via Observation of the “Imams-Roundtable”

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/Fjuvh658HYHaqAXR/?mibextid=oFDknk

The “Imāms-Roundtable” is nothing more than an Ash`arīpalooza. Undoubtedly/unequivically, the “Imāms-Roundtable” is Fraudulent. This-Forum/Entity doesn’t really want Muslim Afro/Latino-Americans united. Rather, they only want the Niggas who take them seriously to be united under the Agenda of Anti Non-Ash`arī Takfīr-Culture. The Only Major-Things which’re “Dog chasing its Tale” discussed are:

1. al-`Aqīdah/Islāmic-Theology (coded very often as “Correct-Creed”), which ironically is nothing more/less than the 6-Arkān/Pillars of al-Īmān (Islāmic-Faith).

2. Pontificating/promoting a Pseudo-Monopoly over being the “Persons of the Sunnah”.

3. Untruthful/Dishonest-Accusations against Fellow-Muslims of ash-Shirk/al-Kufr (Association/Disbelief), via at-Tajsīm/Anthropomosphism.

4. Bitchin&Moanin bout Salafism (wrongly termed “Wahhābism” which in All-Truthfulness/Honesty…”Wahhābism” is a Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative), while ironically Ash`arism/Ahbāshism is just as Hizbī (Heretical/Deviant) as Salafism/Madkhalism.

Vying for the “Sunnī-Monopoly” amongst the Muslims

These-Types/Kinds of Kalām/Rhetoric, pontificating/promoting Takfīr/Blasphemy-Culture against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs, are interjected in very Sly-Ways. It’s almost as Coded-Language, to alert their Constituents. And, this is done for the Same-Reasons how/why Salafīs issue “Refutations” against Muslim Non-Salafīs: it’s done exclusively as Pseudo-Justifications to harm Fellow-Muslims without an-Nadam (Guilt, Remorse, Regret, etc.). Amīn Muhammad has stated Things like that, more than once (publicly). Dāwud Walīd, as well, has (publicly) alluded to the Same Unjust-Takfīr, via their Appearance on the “Imāms-Roundtable”.

Hypocritical-Hizbīs

My Muqaddimah/Introduction to who Amīn Muhammad is and/or thinks they are

It began during 1432, A.H./2011, C.E. @ the M.E.C.C.A.-Center via NYC. They used to teach Classes there. 1-Day while I was there, they were teaching a Class. Appearancewise, I was actually annoyed, I thought they were Salafī (I had abandoned Salafism in 1428, A.H./2007, C.E.) & I honestly wasn’t in the Mood for no Salafī Sucka-Shit. But, then, ironically, Amīn Muhammad started spittin sum Other-Type/Kind of Hizbī/Sectarian Sucka-Shit via Ash`arism. They were saying Things that made me say to myself: “There’s 0-Way any Salafī would ever say this!!!”. Moreover, I was literally the Only-Person via that Particular-Class whom dared to stand against what Amīn Muhammad was spewing. Of course, what they were spewing was Unjust-Takfīr/Takfīr-Culture against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs. According to Ash`arīs like Amīn Muhammad & their Ash`arī-Handlers: they posture that whomever doesn’t co-sign their Theological-Postures are Kuffār/Disbelievers. I literally had a Convo with one of these Ash`arī-Boys by the Name of Abī-Muhammad al-Mālikī…
…they literally admitted to me personally that making Unjust-Takfīr against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs is Wrong & in the Same-Breath stated that they won’t cease making Unjust-Takfīr against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs. This-Clown literally had the Audacity/arrogance to equate Muslim Non-Ash`arīs to “5%ers”. Keep-In-Mind: 5%ers are a Theological-Spinoff of the NOI & NOIers are Closeted-Atheists. Amīn Muhammad has stated directly, Word4Word, that Muslims whom aren’t from the Ash`arī-School are Kuffār. I’ve literally personally heard Amīn Muhammad state those Exact-Things.

`Ām-ut-Tafwīdh Muqābil-ut-Ta’wīl
(Year of Neutrality vs. Interpretation)

My Holistic-Interactions with Amīn Muhammad, Na`īm `Abdillah, Fahīm Lea, etc. had provoked/promoted me to author Several-Articles against their Pontification/Promotion of Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs. The Articles which I’ve written, ironically: literally none amongst them were even capable to responding to anything I detailed. Literally, only my Sibling of the Pen: Tālib “Ash`arī-Papi” Nathaniel…they alone stepped-up to the Plate to even combat what Gareth “Abū-Yams” Bryant authored. Literally, for the Entire-Month of Ramadhān-1445, A.H.: Team-Ash`arī was scared&silent…Team-Salafī couldn’t decide whether they wanted to salute me or refute me…Team-Atharī felt Some-Type/Kind of Way because I did what they wanted Lavotte Saunders (the Atharī-Star) to do. Full-Disosure: there were even those amongst Team-Atharī whom spread Lies & claimed that Lavotte Saunders “rejected” my Articles. But, contrary to this: when I spoke with Lavotte Saunders personally they respected/appreciated my Writings.

at-Tafwīdh/Neutrality vs. at-Ta’wīl/Interpretation concerning the Sifāt/Qualities-Of-Allah

The Hypocritical-Irony behind Ash`arī Takfīr-Culture

1. `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl ibn Abī-Bishr (AKA Abul-Hasan: Progenitor/Founder of the Ash`arī `Aqīdah/Theological-School) the Same-Person Ash`arīs Dick-Ride: they personally stated via their own Deathbed, that they resigned from Unjust-Takfīr/Takfīr-Culture against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Aah`arīs. Now, contrary to Salafī-Propaganda: Abul-Hasan al-Ash`arī never recanted any of their `Aqā’id/Theological-Postures. Rather, what they did was recant their Takfīr-Postures via at-Tawbah/Repentance.

2. Atharism is literally the Theological-Default of the Average/Regular-Muslim…not Ash`arism.

3. It’s a Known-Fact, that all of al-Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals (Peace be upon them altogether) & all the Muslims from Umum/Nations prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān were Theological-Atharīs.

4. It’s a Known-Fact, that at least 90% of as-Sahābah/the Companions (May Allah be pleased with them altogether) were Theological-Atharīs.

5. Conveniently, there’s Countless-Ash`arīs whom audaciously/arrogantly reject the Deathbed-Tawbah of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī: the Irony of course being that one of the Persons whom recorded & transmitted the Deathbed-Tawbah of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī was al-Bayhaqī…an Ash`arī themselves. And, there’s none whom dares to pontificate/claim that al-Bayhaqī is a “Liar”, a “Dishonest-Person”, “Unreliable”, etc.

6. There’s an Important-Sabab/Reason how/why there’s Countless-Ash`arīs and/or Ash`arī-Pretenders would dare reject the Deathbed-Tawbah of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī…it’s because it directly debunks any/all their Pseudo-Justifications to impose Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs. These-Persons can’t stand it, if/when the Deathbed-Tawbah of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī is brought-up. The Deathbed-Tawbah of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī literally knocks the Winds rite outta the Sails of their FisherPrice Ash`arī-Boats.

7. It’s a Known-Fact, that Jeffrey Kearse (AKA Sirāj Wahhāj), is my 1st Official Islāmic-Teacher which I’m their Best-Student (they’ve literally called me their Best-Student publicly for the Record)…it’s a Known-Fact that Sirāj Wahhāj is Theologically-Atharī. None of you Cowardly-Niggas would dare accuse Sirāj Wahhāj of committing ash-Shirk/Association (via at-Tajsīm/Anthropomorphism), and I know how/why. It’s because you Broke-Niggas want/need Sirāj Wahhāj via your “Unity-Conference”, to be a Fundraising-Resource for you, and just as the Ole-Saying goes: “Don’t bite the Hand that feeds you.”.

The Haqqover/Super-Hizbī: Debunking the Pseudo-Justifications for Takfīr-Culture

Muhhammad (Peace be upon them) stated the following regarding at-Takfīr/Blasphemy

“No Person accuses another of either being a Fāsiq/Sinner or a Kāfir (Disbeliever/Non-Muslim), except that he’s one himself, if the Other isn’t which he claimed.”.
(al-Bukhārī)

“Whomever attributes/ascribes Kufr (Disbelief) to his Brother is just like his Killer/Murderer.”.
(al-Bukhārī, at-Tirmidhī)

“If a Muslim calls someone a Kāfir (Disbeliever/Non-Muslim): if they are then let it be, otherwise they themselves are a Kāfir.”
(Abū-Dāwud)

The Evil&Destructive-Nature of Takfīr-Culture

Examining al-Kharajiyyah/Religio-Extremism via Mafia/Gang-Culture amongst Muslims historically & contemporaneously

The “Imāms-Roundtable” is Religio-Spiritual Venom

The “Imāms-Roundtable” is literally no different/better than the Entity known as “SPUBS/Salafi Publications”. The “Imāms-Roundtable” is literally a Proxy Gossip-Session, consisting of Fake-Shaykhs (not all because some of the Guests of the “Imāms-Roundtable” I actually respect as Persons-Of-Knowledge). And, to those whom it applies to: these Fake-Shaykhs do nothing more than increase & exacerbate Theological/Sectarian-Divides between the Muslims. They literally use a Religio-Interpretation of the “Divide-And-Conquer” Concept. These Fake-Shaykhs are Self-Serving Bozos, whom only want their own Marginalized-Enclaves instead of having True-Ijtimā`/Unity with Fellow-Muslims. They literally do precisely what the Salafīs do (whom’re apparently the Number-1 Opps of the Ash`arīs).

50-Shades Of The Minhāj

The Ironic-Intersectionality between Ash`arism & Salafism

The Ash`arīs are no different, superior, better, etc. than the Salafīs. Both Salafism & Ash`arism pontificate/promote Pseudo Religio-Elitism, Pseudo Religio-Superiority, etc. Ash`arism & Salafism are literally 2-Sides of the Same-Coin. Ironically, the Progenitor/Founder of Salafism was in fact a Hybrid-Ash`arī/Mu`tazilī: Muhammad `Abduh. Most-Ash`arīs don’t even know this & Most-Salafīs will vehemently deny this.

You’ll never find this on Salafi Publications: A Necessary Hujjah (Indictment/Refutation) against Saudi Arabia…a kingdom of Sectarian-Deviants, Tyrants, and Powermongers

How to avoid being placed in the “Wahhābī” Box

What do the Ash`arīs actually want though?!!

Ash`arīs really want what the Salafīs still have: a Religio-Cartel…Sectarian-Mafia…etc. They want what the Salafīs have had for Decades: the Fame & the Dames. This is honestly Sifāt/Characteristics of Muslim-Pimping. These Hizbīs/Sectarians, from any/all Ahzāb one can think of-The Ash`arī-Agenda is literally the Same-Formula, to achieve the Same-Objective, as any/all other Ahzāb have used, to keep Muslim-Americans addicted to al-Hizbiyyah/Religio-Sectarianism:

1. Establish themselves via the Hoods (where Many-Persons are downtrodden & largely unsophisticated via their Analyses of Charlatans).

2. Impress the Ignorant (via the Illusion of possessing al-`Ilmiyyah/Islāmic-Knowledge).

3. Spoonfeed Individuals whatever one wants (keeping them coming-back for more like Drug-Addicts & keeping Real/Beneficial-Knowledge Out-Of-Reach).

4. Bedazzle & seduce the Womenfolk of these Communities into their Beds.

5. Attain & maintain the Support of the Muslim-Criminals, Muslim Street-Teams, Muslim Gang-Members, etc. (using one’s Muslim-Muscle to pressure, intimidate, neutralize, eliminate, etc. Religio-Secterian Competition/Opposition).

The Reality of Muslim-Criminality

The Hujjah/Indictment against the Salafī-Mafia

50-Shades Of The Minhāj

I wait a Response, from my Sibling of the Pen regarding This-Article. Gareth Bryant is very interested in the Feedback&Rebuttle from Tālib Nathaniel. Equally, I’d like to see any other “Challengers” whom think/feel they can “debunk” or “dispute” anything I’ve aforementioned.

Gareth Bryant

33 responses »

  1. If you would have at least used the spellchecker, I would have halfway considered reading this. It’s favoritism, not ‘favortism’. It’s ‘In theory’, not ‘In Theory’. This is not scholarly writing and the very thing you call yourself refuting has done a boomerang affect on you. This shows that you have no idea what you are coming up against, at least have your sword sharpen. You don’t come to a gun fight with a watergun. This is laughable. If this is what scholarship should look like from you, we in BIG TROUBLE. Brush up on your spelling, grammar and syntax. Maybe then you will be able to express yourself in the matter you think you see yourself.

    • Number-1: Capitization is very liberal via English. Number-2: You’re literally deflecting from the Facts.

      Persons like you are precisely how/why Muhammad (Peace be upon them) stated:

      “Apathy/Arrogance is denying Truth & mocking People.”.

      (an-Nawawī)

      You’ve literally proven how much of a Bozo you actually are.

  2. Pingback: Dogs Will Always Bark | The Fahlito Brigante Blog

    • The Irony is that Persons like Fahīm Lea are those whom Threaten Others via Social-Media & don’t do Shit when they see those they’ve threatened via Real-Life.

    • The Irony is that Persons like Fahīm Lea are precisely the Reason how/why Muhammad (Peace be upon them) described al-Khawārij/Religio-Extremists as “Kilāb-un-Nār/Dogs of the Fire”…Unjust-Takfīr/Takfīr-Culture is al-Kharajiyyah/Religio-Extremism by default/definition. Ash`arīs/Ahbāshīs are notorious for Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs. And, Fahīm Lea has literally lied about Ash`arīs not imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs.

      • Authored?? Ernest Hemingway and them are rolling over in their graves right now with the way you butcher writing! You’re a fa gut Gareth/Garth, and this is your only outlet (other than a career as EYEson Beckford the model; that’s why I like/share/promote/forward/advocate/boost/publicize your scrawlings (oops!) writings, to help you out. Trust me, nobody, and I mean NOBODY other than yourself in any literary field would consider this writing. At any rate, continue on.

      • I’ve literally lectured via Cambridge University, UK due to my Writings. So, clearly, your Opinions concerning my Writings don’t matter. Also, additionally, you’re the Faggot&Coward…Number-1: You threatened to harm a Fellow-Muslim, which is an Act-Of-Kufr/Disbelief…Number-2: The Last-Time you saw me via Real-Life you didn’t do Shit. You’re 💯% Bitch-Made.

      • You lecturing at Cambridge is a sign of the decline of university education. If you believe what you actually say, then wait until the next time we meet. The only “threat” will be a challenge to talk in person, face to face (I would prefer eye-to-eye, but I understand your dilemma), and say the same things you’re saying now. I CAN’T wait!

      • Yep…there’s nothing tough about what I’m saying;you’re the only one TALKING tough. My only request to you is to do it/say it in real time.

    • Whom’re is just as rare as proper diction, grammar, sentence structure and flow is in this “refutation” from a professional(?) writer.

  3. Pingback: Ignorance + Apathy is both a Poison & Venom | Gareth Bryant

  4. Pingback: Ignorance + Apathy is both a Poison & Venom | Gareth Bryant

  5. Pingback: Ash`arīs Gone Wild | Gareth Bryant

  6. Pingback: The Nifāq/Hypocrisy of Amīn Muhammad | Gareth Bryant

  7. Pingback: Scattered-Maturity | Gareth Bryant

  8. Pingback: How to avoid being placed in the “Wahhābī” Box | Gareth Bryant

  9. Pingback: Romance of the 3-`Aqīdahs | Gareth Bryant

  10. Pingback: The Qābīl vs. Hābīl Effect: Exploring the Anatomy of Hizbī/Sectarian Cock-Blocking | Gareth Bryant

  11. Pingback: The Quwwah/Power of al-Mīrāth/Legacy | Gareth Bryant

  12. Pingback: Debunking the Infamous Ash`arī-Kalām/Rhetoric Talking-Point: The “Allah doesn’t exist in a Place.” Argument | Gareth Bryant

  13. Pingback: Debunking the Infamous Ash`arī-Kalām/Rhetoric Talking-Point: The “Allah doesn’t exist in a Place.” Argument | Gareth Bryant

Leave a comment