![](https://garethbryant.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/screenshot_20240216-185355_facebook5320010664930299867.jpg?w=720)
https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/findings/regional-findings/africa
![](https://garethbryant.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/screenshot_20220702-151337_chrome7682531315150181748.jpg?w=720)
![](https://garethbryant.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/img-20230619-wa00211710708028091256697.jpg?w=744)
This-Video literally pontificates/promotes the Same-`Asabiyyah/Xenophobia, as what they complain about. Ironically, the “Out-Of-Africa” Theory which This-Video dick-rides directly derives from Darwinism/Darwinian-Evolution. According to Darwinism: Afro-Peoples “evolved” from Primates, and then Other-Peoples “evolved” from Afro-Peoples. This-Video undoubtedly proves that Fake-Wokeness isn’t a “Flex”. Oh…by the way: North/West-African Nations directly participated in establishing/profiting from the Trans-Atlantic Slave-Trade…Morocco, Senegal, Gambia, Mauritania, Mali, Nigeria, Togo, Ivory Coast, Benin, Angola, Ghana, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Gabon, Cameroon, etc.
The Arab Muslim Slave Trade Of Africans, The Untold Story
Islāmophobes Worldwide always attempt to use the Subject of al-`Ubūdah/Slavery as a Tool to attack the Integrity of al-Islām. Amongst Atheists, Wannabe-Humanists, Murtads (Apostates/Ex-Muslims), etc.: These-Groups of Islāmophobes particularly use al-`Ubūdah as one amongst their Premier-Arguments to slander al-Islām. Via Reddit, I’ve taken the Liberty to engage&converse with these Types/Kinds of Islāmophobes. They all have 1-Thing in common, via their Argumentation: they all pontificate/claim that Allah is “hypocritical” (the Audacity of These-Niggas), because Allah allows Certain-Things which they deem “Immoral” while prohibiting Certain-Things which they deem “not a Big-Deal”.
https://www.statista.com/chart/30666/estimated-number-of-people-in-modern-slavery-per-1000
As per al-`Ubūdah itself: it’s simply a Fitnah/Test, like any other Fitn/Tests. The Purpose is for Allah to challenge how Humans will behave. And, Allah has the Sole-Entitlement/Justification to test/challenge Their Creation, any Way which They will. So, as per being the Creation-Of-Allah, Created-Things/Beings don’t have the Right to question/challenge how/why Allah chooses to challenge/test Their Creation.
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.67, V.2)
My Response to their Islāmophobic-Kalām/Rhetoric:
Allah decides what’s Moral vs. Immoral. Morality is exclusively predicated upon at-Tanzīl/Revelation. Whatever Allah decides is acceptable, then that’s Morality & whatever Allah decides is unacceptable, then that’s Immorality. It’s really that simple. I mean, by default, the Muslim is the Slave of Allah via once’s Compliance with al-Islām…al-Islām literally means “Voluntary-Servitude” by the way. (Lisān-ul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language, ibn-Manzhūr)
Now, contrary to Popular Islāmophobic-Opinion: al-Islām doesn’t allow Enslavement & there’s an Important-Difference between Slavery & Enslavement. Enslavement is making someone who’s already a Free-Person into a Slave-Person. Enslavement is what’s Islāmically-Prohibited. And, there’s Countless-Incentives for Slave-Masters to treat one’s Slaves respectfully & even free one’s Slaves, such as: Forgiveness of Sins, Decreased-Accountability/Punishment via the Hereafter, etc. (al-Bukhārī, Muslim, ibn-Mājah, Ahmad)
By the way…since we’re talking about it: what does Morality/Immorality actually mean?!!!
a. Morality- late 14c., moralite, “moral qualities, virtuous conduct or thought,” from Old French moralite (Modern French moralité) “moral (of a story); moral instruction; morals, moral character” (13c.) and directly from Late Latin moralitatem (nominative moralitas) “manner, character,” from Latin moralis “of manners or morals; moral” (see moral (adj.)). Meaning “doctrine or system of ethical duties” is from mid-15c. Meaning “goodness, characteristic of being moral, virtuousness” is attested from 1590s.
b. Immorality- 1560s, from assimilated form of in- (1) “not, opposite of” + morality.
(Courtesy of etymonline.com)
It’s actually quite ironic, that Persons whom posture These-Kinds/Types of Arguments regarding Morality vs. Immorality are themselves quite Amoral. They’ve 0 Moral-Compass which they operate from, because Persons like them utterly reject the Reality that only at-Tanzīl/Revelation determines Morality vs. Immorality. In All-Truthfulness/Honesty: Morality by default is exclusively a Religio-Concept. And to attempt to decipher Moral vs. Immorality via Non-Religio/Secular Standards of Right vs. Wrong is 💯%-Inaccurate/Dishonest.
These Same-Persons, who’ve got so much to say regarding al-`Ubūdah, literally are silent when it comes to Issues such as: Financial-Slavery via Credit-Card/Loan Debt…Interest-Debt…etc., Sexual-Slavery via the Sex/Porn-Industry, Socio-Political Slavery via Communism…Republicanism…Democracy…Monarchy, Crime-Slavery via the “War-On-Drugs”…etc., the Prison Industrial-Complex…Military-Slavery via Imperialism, the “War-On-Terror”, etc.
For More-Info. concerning Revelatory-Texts about Slavery in al-Islām:
http://www.abuaminaelias.com/islam-and-slavery/
Gareth Bryant