Tag Archives: Progressive Muslims

A Response to the Article, “the Qur’an does not prohibit women’s marriage to people of the book – and other facts about interfaith marriage in Islam”

Standard

Author’s-Note:

The Following is a Response to an Article, sent to me, regarding this Pathological-View that Muslim-Women are Islāmically-Allowed to “marry” Non-Muslim Men. The Name of Source of the Article is, “Freedom from the Forbidden” and here’s the Artcle itself:

https://orbala.wordpress.com/2017/08/01/the-quran-does-not-prohibit-womens-marriage-to-people-of-the-book-and-other-facts-about-interfaith-marriage-in-islam/

The Author of this Article is being completely Dishonest, pertaining to the Islāmic-Prohibition of Muslim-Women “marrying” Non-Muslim Men period. The Qur’ān states Clearly, within Chpt.2, V.221 that unless a Man believes (if he’s a Mushrik/Committer of Shirk/Association) then it’s 💯%-Unconditionally Mahrūm/Islāmically-Prohibited for a Muslim-Woman to give herself to any Non-Muslim Man. Now, let’s examine what Shirk is: from the Verb “Sharaka”, meaning “To partner, to share, to collaborate, to conspire, etc.”.( Lisānul-`Arab: Lexicon of the Arabic-Language) The Islāmic-Definition of Shirk, among countless places within the Qur’ān Word4Word define what Shirk is: to state, think/believe, pontificate, promote, etc. anything about Allah which isn’t based upon Revelation.(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.18; Chpt.9, V.30; Chpt.18, V.1-6)

Based upon the Proofs from the Qur’ān directly, this proves that any/every Non-Muslim Man is Mahrūm for any/every Muslim-Woman & any/every Muslim-Woman is Mahrūm for any/every Non-Muslim Man. It’s very simple: Marriage is an Act of Worship Islāmically, and any/all Acts of Worship must at all Times possess Precedent within direct orders within Revelatory-Texts (the Qur’ān&Sunnah). And, there’s absolutely Zero-Precedent for Muslim-Women to either be “married” to any Non-Muslim Man, or for any Muslim-Woman to remain “married” to any Non-Muslim Man. If “marrying” Non-Muslim Men/remaining “married” to Non-Muslim Men would’ve been Mahlūl/Islāmically-Allowed, then all of the Female-Companions (May Allah be pleased with them) of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) who had Non-Muslim Husbands would’ve been Allowed to remain “married” to their Non-Muslim “Husbands”, meaning that V.221 in Chpt.2 of the Qur’ān would’ve either never been revealed, or it would’ve been made Mansūkh/Abrogated.

Moreover, if this were True, Umm-Habībah: one of the Wives of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) & and the Daughter of Abī-Sufyān (May Allah be pleased with her), would’ve been Allowed to remain “married” to her Non-Muslim “Husband” prior to being married to Muhammad. Also, as with the Case of `Ikrimah (May Allah be pleased with him): the Son of Abī-Jahl, who became a Muslim during/after the Conquest of al-Makkah; his Wife became a Muslim prior to him, and she explained to him that if he didn’t accept Islām that they couldn’t be together.(ar-Rahīq-ul-Makhtūm/The Sealed-Nectar; Hayāt-us-Sahābah/Lives of the Companions) In other words: stop being Dishonest & stop try to commit Tahrīf (Distortion of Islāmic-Texts either in Word or in Meaning). Because, in all actuality, all you’re doing is encouraging Muslim-Women (under this False-Flag of Women’s-Liberation: a Euphemism for Feminism, Feminism itself, Religious-Reformation which Islām does not need, etc.) to commit az-Zinā/Sexual-Lewdness (THOT-Like Behavior) with Non-Muslim Men. This Article is just as Evil, and its Author is Misguided.

Gareth Bryant/2017

A “Female-Imam”: What is this?!!!

Standard

Pamela Taylor pic

Author’s note:

This article is exclusively based upon finding out that the person whom had wrote the Pro-Homoesxual/Same-Gender-Marriage article for AltMuslim, Pamela Taylor, apparently, has been granted the title of “Imam”. Now, What I plan to do is to simply clarify what exactly an Imam truly is, in both its linguistic, Islamically historical context, and whom has the entitlement to be labeled “Imam” in the 1st-place.

Let’s begin…linguistically:

The word, Imam, inherently, is actually from the Arabic verb “Āmma” meaning to afront/to be in front, to lead, to supersede, to head, etc. So, with that being said, anyone, theoretically/realistically can be a leader.(Lisan-ul-`Arab/The Tongue of the `Arab [Lexicon of the Arabic-Language])

Next, let’s examine the types/categories of Imamah/Leadership:

There are many different, universal types of Imamah/Leadership, such as the following: Parents, Teachers, Sports-Coaches/Owners, Principals, Business-Owners, etc. Any/all of these respective types of Imamah/Leadership, is for anyone/everyone. In other words, any/all Human beings are 100%-entitled to take the reigns of these manifested types of Imamah/Leadership. However, when it comes to specific religious-duties, particularly/especially within Islam, then, now, the rules must change, as to whom are allowed to possess Imamah/Leadership, as well as to which extent that Imamah/Leadership is Islamically allowed to be taken.

Now, let’s investigate the Islamic definition of “Imam” & who is justified to carry this title:

Imam, firstly, is a Masculine-Noun in the Arabic-Language, and just like any/all Nouns within the Arabic-Language, their Natures are exclusive to their Genders. In the Arabic-Language, which is the language which Allah had purposely chosen to reveal the Qur’an in (Noble Qur’an: Chpt.12, V.3), no noun (person, place, thing, concept, idea, etc.) is “unisex” or “unigender”…Every noun, which the word “Imam” is, in the Arabic-Language, has to be either masculine or feminine, exclusive for/to either males or female created-things. Even in referrence to created things which don’t have a gender, at all, like Angels, for example: the name “Khalifah”, meaning caretaker, custodian, ruler, etc., which is most commonly known by its bureaucratic definition, being the recognized global-leader of Muslims…this particular geo-political position can only be held by a Muslim-Man, and even linguistically, even though the word, Khalifah, has an apparent feminine-ending, it is still, in fact, exclusively, a masculine-word.(al-Khulafa’-ur-Rashidun, Jalal-ud-Din as-Suyuti; Lisan-ul-`Arab) We, then, have the word “Malak” (pl. Mala’ikah), meaning Angel, is masculine, by virtue of the fact that Angels were created, by Allah, without a gender. So, because of that, the word in Arabic, Angel, itself, as well as the actual names & characteristics of Angels, are also, by definition/extension, must be masculine. This was a very huge-issue, during the lifetime of Muhammad (Peace be upon him), because, the Pagan-Arabs had a religious-view, that Angels were, female & the “daughters of Allah”. However, when the Qur’an was revealed, it thus clarified this degenerate religious-belief, among all of the beliefs of the Pagan-Arabs.(Noble Qur’an: Chpt.37, V.149-156) So, with that being said, it becomes, thus, very clear, that any noun in the Qur’an, must, at all times, coincide with a respective gender.

Now, coming back, full-circle, to the main point of inference, the primary-topic, at hand, concerning the whole “Female-Imam” issue: we can now get our hands dirty, about this issue. The term Imam, relative to what I’m directly referring to, in the context of the claim of Pamela Taylor, as being a “Female-Imam”, we know based upon text, from both the Qur’an & Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition, as well as simply from the linguisitc-dyanmics of the Arabic-Language, that there is no way that a Muslim-Woman can be an “Imam”, in any religious-context. Before I continue, it’s fair that I go in-depth as to what an “Imam”, in the context of what Pamela Taylor is claiming: it is referring to, directly, leading both Muslim-Men & Muslim-Women in prayers, giving the weekly Khutbah/Sermon, on the day of al-Jumu`ah/Friday. Please, note, that this has never been done, before, from among any members of the Salaf (the 1st-3-generations of Muslims, after the revelation of the Qur’an: as-Sahabah/the Companions of Muhammad [May Allah be pleased with them all-together], as well as the 1st & 2nd-generations of at-Tabi`in/the Followers of as-Sahabah [May Allah mercify them all-together]). And, if anyone from among the Ummah (Nation/MuslimCommunity) of Muhammad would’ve been justified to enact this practice, it would’ve definitely been these Muslim-Women, from among the Salaf & more specifically, the Wives of Muhammad (May Allah be pleased with them), because they were, by-and-large, the most-righteous, as well as the most knowledgeable Muslim-Women, during the lifetime of Muhammad, as well as among the Salaf, and yet, none of them, participated in leading both Muslim-Men & Muslim-Women, in any prayers, nor did any of the give any Khutub (sing. Khutbah) on the day of al-Jumu`ah.

What’s interestingly-ironic is that these “Progressive-Muslim” individuals/groups, whom all co-sign this Bid`ah (Religious-Innovation) never taken into consideration that the best people among the Muslims, relative to the revelation of the Qur’an, never did this. And, it absolutely tickles me, when people reference our (religious) mother, `A’ishah (May Allah be pleased with her), whom wielded immense religio-scholastic, geo-political prestige & authority: her husband being Muhammad of course, the last Prophet/Messenger of Allah & her own father, Abdullah ibn Abi-Quhafah…AKA Ab-Bakr as-Siddiq (May Allah be pleased with him), whom religio-scholastically taught mostly Muslim-Men, her entire life, after the death of Muhammad, and even raising an army, against her own cousin-in-law, `Ali ibn Abi-Talib, while he was a Khalifah (May Allah be pleased with him); yet, guess what, folks…yeah…you’ve got it…SHE NEVER LED ANY MUSLIIM-MEN IN ANY PRAYER, NOT EVEN ONE DAY, IN HER ENTIRE LIFE. As powerful as she was, in both religious-academics, as well, as on the geo-political stage, she knew that she had absolutely no justification to lead Muslim-Men in any prayers.

So, for someone to come, not days, years, decades, but, centuries, after her death, whom are clearly not as knowledgeable, Islamically, as she was, nor could they ever be, and proclaim that being a “Female-Imam” is Islamically valid, when the best of Muslim-Women, from among the best of Muslims, never did this, shows a very clear, obvious disease of the heart, which is spreading, like a wildfire with that’s HIV-infected. I, Gareth Bryant, do by, henceforth, dare to challenge, any Muslim, “Muslim-Feminist”, “Progressive-Muslim”, “Reform-Muslim”, regardless of one’s sectarian-persuasions, to provide any proof, even an abrogated-proof, from either the Qur’an, Sunnah, or the documented-practices of the Salaf, which gives any at all justification for a Muslim-Woman to be a “Female-Imam”.

Gareth Bryant/2013

Enough with this ridiculous “Gay-Mosques” business!!!

Standard

Author’s note:
This phenomenon of “Gay-Mosques” or “Gay-Friendly Mosques” has been plaguing the Muslim-Community, in the United States, for some time. Now, this phenomenon has spread elsewhere, like in Paris, France, for example. This entire concept of a “Gay-Mosques” or “Gay-Friendly Mosque” is not only utterly ridiculous, but, misleading & deceptive as well…don’t worry, I’ll get into why.

So, for Muslims, of liked-minds, whom also find this notion just as ridiculous as I do, the best way to respond to something like this would be the following:

If some group of Muslims who happen to be Child-Molesters, or Rapists, who want to open a Mosque, which cater to Child-Molesters, or Rapists, let’s see how many people would be up-in-arms in support of that. I mean, really, intelligently observe, reflect upon how ridiculous that would sound, a “Pedophile/Pedophile-Friendly Mosque”, or a “Rapist/Rapist-Friendly Mosque”.

Would any Muslim, Non-Muslim, or any morally-sound and/or intelligent Human being, whom you know, actually take a notion such as that seriously?!!! Well, then, what in the Hell would make anyone think that a “Homo-Mosque/Homo-Friendly-Mosque”, or a “Gay/Gay-Friendly-Mosque” would be something that is a thing to establish?!!!

The Mosques are the properties of Allah(Noble Qur’an: Chpt.72, V.18). And as such, are required to be established upon certain things, mainly, the following:

1. They have to be places where only Allah is worshipped

2. They have to be places where all of the 5-prayers are made, 24/7.

3. They have to be places where the Muslims are in complete-control over & cannot be converted into something other than Mosques.

Now, Imma just concentrate on the first condition that I’ve just mentioned:
Allah clearly states, “Have you not seen one, whom after Allah has guided, take his own desires as a god, then Allah, knowingly, left him astray, as well as sealing his hearing, heart & sight as a punishment? Do you not reflect?”.(Noble Qur’an: Chpt.45, V.23)

As Muslims, we’ve all been given divine-guidance from Allah. However, unfortunately, instead of cherishing this great favor & blessing, from the Lord of the Universe, we blatantly insult this guidance, by rebelling against the commandments of Allah & His Messenger, Muhammad (Peace be upon him). To put it even more plainly: Homosexuality, like any & every other sin, in Islam, is not acceptable to Allah, at all. But, sadly, the Muslims, in order to continue to be accepted by those whom are Non-Muslims, in Non-Islamic societies, and/or as a result of just falling for the deception of the Devil, have decided to compromise on everything & stand-up for nothing. And, this issue is not very different than any other issue that Muslims have sold-out on.

Now, going back to what I had mentioned, concerning, the Mosques being the properties of Allah, this is something that has to be taken very seriously. How can a Muslim really respect the sanctity of the Mosques of Allah by attributing things which Allah clearly hates with these places of exclusive-worship to Him? You cannot serve Allah, as your god, and your desires, at the same time, you have to pick who/what you’re going to devote yourself to. A Muslim cannot, in Islamic-Conscience, justify their desires or whims, which directly contradict what Allah has prohibited, it just doesn’t work that way. You can’t mix something pure with something impure & expect to yield a pure-result: best-case scenario, they, the pure & impure cancel one another out, while the worse-case scenario, the impure completely dominates the pure…either way, you’re not winning. Furthermore, Allah clearly mentions how He had destroyed & erased the entire existence of the first people in Human-History whom were Homosexuals(Qasa-ul-Anbiya’/Stories of the Prophets, by Abul-Fida’ Isma`il ibn-Kathir ad-Dimashqi); so, what makes you think that this “Homo-Mosque” idea is acceptable at all to Allah, when He had specifically chose to destroy a people for being Homosexual?

Basically, the Muslims have become the religious-versions of whores of a male-prison, ready willing & able to drop-the-soap, in the shower-room, in front of anyone/everyone, on purpose. Now, if you drop the soap in the shower-room of a prison, what do you think/expect to happen? You figure it out!!! It’s very sad, how Muslims feel that they have to compromise everything, that is Islamically mandatory/prohibitory, just to fit into the circles of the in-crowds of their peers or societies. And, ironically (as you’d think that the Muslims would’ve learned this by now), nobody respects a sell-out, even the person/persons, society/societies whom you’re selling-out to.

And, now, ironically, sadly, shamefully, in the the present-day, we as Muslims, think that it’s “progressive”, or “politically-correct”, or “cute” to have a “Gay/Gay-Friendly Mosque”, to show people that we’re inclusive-News-Flash: THAT’S NOT HOW YOU SHOW PEOPLE INCLUSIVITY!!! We show people inclusivity by giving anyone/everyone their rights as creations of Allah & as Human beings, and equal, fair opportunities to learn about Islam, to make their own choices whether to to accept Islam or not. We don’t show inclusivity by accepting the sins of people & passing them off as something that’s “not a big-deal”, or “not important”, or “small-issues”. Anything that either Allah or His Messenger made prohibited needs to be treated as such, and it is not okay, Islamically, to pretend, or to water-down the severity & ugliness of those prohibitions, just to be seen as “modern”, or “progressive”, or “pluralistic”, or in the eyes of our current societies.

Gareth Bryant/2012

My thoughts on “Gay-Muslims”:

Standard

Daayiee Abdullah pic

Author’s note:

This is written as a Result of a Website that had been displayed on my Facebook-Timeline, called “gaymuslims.org”. So, since it was posted on my Wall, I had decided to just take a look at what they were talking about. Usually, Most-Muslims, particularly Muslim-Men, consider this Topic of Discussion in and of itself “Dangerous-Ground”. But, for those who know me, I live kinda dangerously anyway. 😀

Anyway, what I had found on the Site was actually better than I had thought initially. I will share my Opinions on this Site, as well as the General-Motive that I perceive that the Site intends. Now, it’s very obvious that Homosexuality is a Big-Deal Islamically. And, this issue is also a very Touchy/Sensitive-Subject as well; but, in our Modern-Age, we, as an Ummah/Muslim-Community (locally, nationally, globally, etc.) must address this Issue full-throttle. There has to be some Way that we can communicate with the Homosexual-Demographic, in order to reach out to them, to call them to al-Islām. I mean, seriously, they deserve to be informed of the guidance of al-Islām, just as much as any other Demographic. However, our Balāghah/Approach would have to be very tactful & wise, but, also uncompromising.

I’ll explain what I mean:

Referring to being tactful & wise, this basically means that we, as Muslims, are to call people, whom may be Homosexual, in a way that does not make us seem like we’re constantly condemning them, for their Lifestyle-Choice/Sexual-Preference. Realistically, Homosexuality was just as much of an Issue during the Lifetimes of the Prophets Lot & Muhammad (Peace be upon them both), as it is now. We all know of the People of Lot, whom were the 1st-Persons, in Human-History, to be Homosexuals, and in Pre-Islāmic Arabia, Homosexuality was so common among the Arabs, that Muhammad specifically said, “Don’t allow Men who imitate Women nor Women who imitate Men into your Houses.”.(al-Bukhārī, al-Kabā’ir/The Major-Sins, adh-Dhahabī) But, this has never been the Initial-Issues that Allah had commanded Lot, nor Muhammad, for that matter, to address their People with firstly. In fact, the 1st-Thing that Allah had ever commanded the Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals (Peace be upon them altogether) to call People to is at-Tawhīd/Islāmic-Monotheism (the Recognition & Acceptance that Allah exists eternally [no Beginning/Ending] & that only He is worshipworthy). In The Qur’ān itself, it clearly mentions that the 1st-Thing that Lot was commanded to tell his People was to stop worshipping Idols, and to start worshipping Allah.(Noble Qur’ān: Chpt.26, V.161-163)

Referring to being uncompromising: this basically means that even though we definitely want People to become Muslims, regardless of their respective Lifestyle-Choices/Sexual-Preferences, it needs to be made very clear that Homosexuality is an Unacceptable Lifestyle-Choice/Sexual-Preference. There are in fact 2 Main-Things which the Muslim-Community has to make sure doesn’t happen: a. We cannot allow ourselves to be Pigeon-Holed via the Public-Eye, when it comes to this Type/Kind of Social-Political Issue, as being People whom are unwelcoming to All-Members of Society, to accept al-Islam. In Other-Words, we have to be sure that we, as a Muslim-Community, ensure People that the Guidance of Allah, which is sl-Islam, is for everyone, and to not imitate the Jews, Hindus, etc. whom don’t call People to Judaism, because they believe that it is just for them, just as Allah says in The Qur’ān, describing The Qur’ān itself as al-Hudā/Guidance for Humanity.(Noble Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.185) b. We cannot imitate the Christians, whom compromise so many Things, just so People can be/become Christians. Historically, as well as contemporarily, Christians have watered-down their own Religion, just to increase in Numbers, completely disregarding their own Religious-Standards, in order to be a Popular-Religion. We must be truthful/honest with People, and inform them of what is Right & Wrong, according to ash-Sharī`ah/Islāmic-Law, not according to what our Egos & Desires tell us what is Right & Wrong.

It needs to be established that, according to Islāmic-Law, Homosexuality is indeed a Sin. At no Time though are we, as a Muslim-Community, to allow people to assume that we, as Muslims, legitimize Homosexuality, as something “Normal/Natural”, or a Valid Lifestyle-Choice/Sexual-Preference. We must not allow ourselves, under the ambiguous & entrapping Matrix of Political-Correctness, Openness, Modernity, etc. to fog our own Religious-Standards, and allow people to think/believe that Homosexuality is a Positive-Thing, when in All-Reality it’s a Negative-Thing. According to Revelatory/Islāmic-Texts (even prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān) it’s 100% Completely-Unacceptable, just like any other Rajm/Sexual-Deviation/Sin…Homosexuality is just as much a Vices as: Bestiality, Child-Molestation, Rape, Pornography/Prostitution, Adultery/Non-Marital Sex, Fornication/Pre-Marital Sex, etc. All of the Aforementioned-Things are Mahrūm/Islāmically-Prohibited deemed prohibited & shameful.(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.17, V.32; Qasas-ul-Anbiya’/Stories of the Prophets, ibn-Kathir; al-Kaba’ir)

However, one of the many Negative-Things which we, as Muslims, tend to do is place Favoritism of Certain-Sins over Other-Sins, just like how Christians view Homosexuality as an Abomination, yet, ironically, see no Problem with worshipping Jesus-Christ (Peace be upon him), a Being/Created-Thing, along with Allah: the Creator/Lord of the Universe, which, realistically, is far worse than any Sexual-Vice. Islāmically, a Sin is a Sin & we, as Human-Beings, don’t have the Entitlement/Justification to pontificate/claim, “Well…at least this Sin is not worse than that Sin.”. Our Maslahah/Purpose, as Muslims, is to avoid al-Fusūq/Sinning, in its totality, not to just avoid Major-Sins, Sins which we personally don’t like/want to do, etc. Now, referring to the “gaymuslims.org” Website, I do respect their Motives & Efforts, to reach out to the Homosexual-Community. However, there needs to be a Definitive-Stance against the Lifestyle-Choice itself, which I didn’t really see present on this Site.

I know the Reason as to why this had not been highlighted on this Particular-Site, to not ostracize anyone & to make them comfortable enough to open their Minds/Hearts to al-Islām. But, I view this as a Potential-Opening, which could on a Positive-Note, bring Members of the Homosexual-Community to al-Islam & just as well it could very well become a Great-Challenge, by having them think/believe that they don’t have to alter their Lifestyle-Choices/Sexual-Preferences.

And, this is very problematic, because again, it has to be made crystal-clear that this Sexual-Preference is not Natural/Normal, but rather a Result of Lack of Exposure to Divine-Guidance, Taught/Learned-Behavior and/or various Psycho-Emotional Issues/Trauma which are imposed upon People, etc. I mean, there’s a Reason why the Term Lifestyle-Choice has the word “Choice” in it, and why the Term Sexual-Preference/Orientation has the word “Preference/Orientation” in it: when it comes to having Consensual-Sex with someone, it’s exclusively one’s own Volition, which guides Decision-Making to copulate with Members of either the Same-Gender or the Opposite-Gender.

This is really all that I have to say about this Website, as well as this Issue. I know that I’ll be getting a whole lot of Positive/Negative-Feedback and Positive/Negative-Comments about this Article, which honestly, I gladly accept. Obviously, I’m no Scholar, neither in a Religious-Arena nor Secular-Realm. But, I know just enough about both Revelatory/Islāmic-Texts, as well as Secular-Issues, to speak about this Issue via Authority. For anyone who would like to comment, please, comment away.

Gareth Bryant/2012